- Page 1 of 1
Gallery + Critique
/
3D Still + Animation
old mans face
-
18 Jan 2007hey guys
Here a turn table of a doodle i did
40min doodleing in mudbox.
http://eidesign.dk/wip/3d/oldbeardFace.mov - 1mb
hope i can find som time to finish it. But in the middle of moving to a new apartment
/cheers -
18 Jan 2007cool! what did you render that in, mudbox? i've been dabbling a bit in MB too, but haven't made anything worth posting yet.
really cool model, though. are you planning some realistic detail for it, textures and all? And if so, what are you going to texture it in? -
Claymation 600 posts18 Jan 2007really nice! He looks like he's one of those heads made out of butter at the state fair.
I haven't touched Mudbox yet, but I'm getting pretty decent with zbrush. Have you used zbrush at all? And if so how does it compare to mudbox? -
18 Jan 2007Hi Hype, thx for the word!
Rendered in max -vray 3vray light setup+a bit of GI. Its not even the highst lvl subdivision i imported in max.
I duno, what direction i'm turning too yet, did only doodle from a box
texture... well, havet layout out the uvs sooo duno if i can rebuild the face with uv's layed out from max.
but if i'm gonna texture it, its gonna be with ps, cant seem to get nice texture details with zb :/
/cheers mate -
18 Jan 2007Clay- i haven't had too much experience in either, but I know this - when i opened zbrush to play around, i had to watch videos and read the help to get started. when i opened mudbox, i just started sculpting and had something in 5 minutes without reading one single thing about the program. it's MUCH MUCH more intuitive and user friendly. But i haven't yet found mudbox's equivelant of being able to block out a form with those sphere shapes the way zbrush does.
keep at vader, it'll be cool to see if you do anything else with it. Mudbox sure is fun to just open and doodle in, isn't it? -
18 Jan 2007ye it is, i do like zb too, to the modeling process, nearly the same i think - perhaps i'm a bit wacky sinces i like zb ui
but true mudbox, is more simple so far. -
Claymation 600 posts18 Jan 2007Yeah i found zbrush pretty confusing at first too. I still haven't used zspheres much as I do most of the base modeling in maya. Mudbox doesn't have any texturing capabilities though, right? I sometimes bring things into zbrush just to paint color maps.
-
18 Jan 2007mudbox is simpler by far, but also doesn't have the range of features that zbrush has. Zbrush is more oriented for a pipeline, whereas Mudbox I think is oriented for guys who just want to sculpt. You can do soooo much more in Zbrush and have what seems to be a bit more control over every little detail. In Mudbox, it feels a bit constrained, and more wholesome. Both are powerful apps though. But I'd have to say i'm going to stick with Zbrush for now, until they develop Mudbox further.
-Z -
Jonathan 480 posts18 Jan 2007I think Mudbox has a bright future
http://www.3dvf.com/DATA/galerie/artist ... fc2193.jpg
http://pix.nofrag.com/a0/0b/8d946ac1ff8 ... 9d7cf9.jpg
http://neilblevins.com/artgallery/..%5C ... cker_h.jpg -
18 Jan 2007Kolby Jukes does present a good case for Mudbox with his star witness, Mr. banner.
-Z -
18 Jan 2007
- Page 1 of 1
Simply CG Contributors
